brooknbrichardy's Journal

Wall Street insider reveals POTUS Barack obama is unionizing the American armed forces
According to a Wall Street insider with first-hand knowledge of the goings on within the Obama administration, there are interests inside the White Residence - possibly going as high as Barack Obamahimself - which are positioning to unionize the whole military.

Based on the insider interview, the motive for the move would be to ensure that U.S. armed service personnel are “justly represented.”'

With Mr. Obama spending considerably of his time more than the last 3 years placating unions, it isn't really that far of a stretch to think about this report as a actual possibility. As is pointed out in the interview, this is an really grave and hazardous scenario.

A unionized military services would come to be beholden not towards the US Constitution or the American individuals, but rather, towards the union and labor bosses in control of the brand new military “workers' parties” that may undoubtedly spring up due to this fact.

There is usually no doubt that the coming election will see a whole new degree of class warfare and we might be particular unions and their leadership will probably be leading the way. The particular movement is already creating and union leaders in recent months have referred to as on Obama to essentially begin a fight with non-unionized Usa.

From the opinion of the White House, the method of unionizing the military may perhaps appear sound. By unionizing, they'll add hundreds of thousands of new democratic voters to the party, when in the identical time shifting the loyalties of military personnel to politically align using the expansion of socialist principles across America.

No longer will it be on the subject of love of country. As far as as national defense is concerned, this may certainly turn into a security threat on quite a few various levels, namely that a unionized force may possibly be easier to sway in the event of required military services deployments in U.S. metropolitan areas.

For those who have unions massive unrest in the streets, maybe violently rising up and targeting non-union connected workers as well as firms, just what are the probabilities that a unionized military services are going to swoop in to support those who are non-union? This is just 1 of numerous hazards we will understand with this sort of a predicament.

Just before you overall dismiss such prospects as out of the question, we need to have just guide ones focus to Russia's Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 which, although a various scenario compared to what there is in U.S.A. these days, was basically planned by scores of 'workers' which thought they were not necessarily being treated reasonably - surely a circumstance we are facing here in America today.

Those working people rebelled, disorder ruled, and what came out the other end was in fact the actual iron fist associated with communism which was liable for the actual demise connected with millions of individuals in the 20th century.

May seem improbable - we know. Yet up until a few years gone so did mandated nationalized medical and us government control of non-public field corporations.Military Movements

Current Mood: nauseated
Current Music: Indy